In all fairness, people may not deem the first ever Twister as one of the great films of all times, but over time, people tend to appreciate the movie more and more and for the same reason why an older Gap jacket looks better than it actually is. Physically demanding construction elements such as seams that are neatly finished or the use of quality materials no longer is available in the type of clothing sold today, which is merely a mishmash of plastic sheeting and surgical glue.
Given the content slop that’s mainstream in the 2020s, so many of the elements that made Jan de Bunt’s movie a meat and potatoes blockbuster back in 1996 now appear almost artisanal, and I’m not talking only about the practical effects enormous wind machines, helicopters dropping tractors, which, by the look of it, have aged well.
Also notable are the now ‘out of fashion’ features such as the lighting which exist for the purpose of showcasing the numerous faces of a range of character actors including Alan Ruck and Jeremy Davies, Todd Field, and a young Philip Seymour Hoffman, all cast in the roles of storm brandishing PhD candidates. For that matter, we even get to see the heads of the stars, Bill Paxton with the typical Middlesex man’s head and Helen Hunt with her wholesome warm looks as two women whose beauty was only improved by real life definition.
In a nutshell, Twister was a disaster film with comic undertones about divorce, in contrast to an empty fat His Girl Friday about two eccentric, obsessive people resolving their conflicts during a single day where they are attempting to drop a few tennis ball sized instruments into a tornado. It was utterly ridiculous even when Hunt suggests that twister was responsible for taking her family out but it was also mature in a pleasant way that seems so out of place today, with people who had been through some life experiences as well.
I’m saying, Twister isn’t holy as they say, and Twisters is not a disgrace to the heritage. This sequel, and the almost thirty years since the first film was released that it took to make, is disappointing, rather than infuriating, because it seems to me that we have forgotten how to operate and create in this kind of style.
It’s an effort to produce something over the top and vapid that forever gets in its own way and becomes jocular about issues that do not warrant any merriment in the slightest. Not exactly a throwback, but not an inventive refresh of the first installment either. If Twister is a great vintage piece, Twisters is an overpriced cheap looking sweater that claims to care about its materials but the reality is it doesn’t.
Out of Twisters, however, one individual emerges at the top and that is Glen Powell. In Twisters, Powell plays Tyler Owens who goes as “Tyler the Tornado Wrangler” and hails from Arkansas where he works with a grunge group who has turned T-Shirt sales and You tube into a career of Extreme Sports. Times may be tough for Tyler as he has a meteorology degree and though he looks like an artist at the edge of society, he has conviction about his antics all thanks to Powell’s distinct portrayal of ‘The teddies who are annoying but are equally incompetent’ who plays the role of a self aware bimbo.
Stubbed in this way, Powell’s tale doesn’t help very much he is a simple handsome man with a pretty dangerous smile, the mechanics of which would be inappropriate in a more serious film, but twisters are clearly the role Russell was born for. He is not a lead actor, and perhaps it is good that way as Twisters is more directed towards supporting roles. A film that has such a tornado in it does appear grand and should be portrayed with a certain level of grandeur but director Lee Isaac Chung and star Daisy Edgar-Jones seem struggling with how to tackle the task.
Edgar Jones and Chung’s case is similar: Their world is quite intimate. Chung’s filmography so far includes contemplative indies such as his semi-autobiographical 2020 family-farm drama Minami but which one of the sub titles from Edgar’s Twisters with him in a field holding a camera in front of his face while looking up, is vaguely reminiscent of the more eloquent prologue shot of Edgar Jones’s 2021 film Twisters.
In Twisters, which was scripted by Mark L. Smith, Kate Cooper (Edgar-Jones), holds the emotional conflicts of her characters, especially that of the injured Kate, her protagonist, over the more engaging conflicts about the massive storms that rage around her. In the movie, Kate’s character becomes an experimental tornado taming project who loses her love partner (Daryl McCormack) as well as two school fellows (Kiernan Shapka and Nik Domani) to a similar project gone wrong; a traumatic plot line that is as dull as could be made, notwithstanding Edgar Jones’s constipated look or the peeks to damp her own neck with the back of her palm.
It’s not obvious either, why Edgar-Jones, who looks like have just come out of the cast of a Liberty of London party frock, is always given very culturally enclosed American parts. But it is down to her Oklahoma accent that varies in degree most probably as a matter of intention or not which is not as much a problem as the film’s focus on her character waking up from some slumber to find herself in the weather reading business.
Invited back to her native Woods by Jovi, a business partner of hers with a sheath Anthony Ramos who is not appropriately consummated love designs when Tyler arrives this relationship is very unbalanced she is a normal woman who slowly learns to live with survivor’s guilt, more a series of events than an impressive display of character evolution.
Whenever Tyler rides whooping through the scope with his custom Harleys and fishes Brandon Pereia, Sasha Lane, Katy O’Brian of Love Lies Bleeding, Tunde Adelie of TV on the Radio’s band gets hungry this Los gets to Menelaus of the post who has lower hopes of being in much more fun pic than the one we are to adjusting.
The most modern and the most exasperating facet of Twisters is the obsession with recreating high stakes for an essentially lighthearted plot. It’s not the type of film that would hurl a rogue cow across the screen, which is okay the tornadoes, which integrate some footage of actual tornadoes, still have an impressive look, particularly when the movie gives itself the freedom to create a set piece based on an oil refinery and a vintage film theatre. But this film is also unable to say the term climate change, even as the story goes on and hints that climate change will only get worse.
In Twisters, there is no target at which its viewers are intended to aim their understanding, and the audience is treated to quixotic images of tornadoes and subsequent destruction of the settlements with veneration of forlorn America as a backdrop. It’s the same story of the original film with eccentric scientists against the big bad capitalism, only this time around the world is driven by money. Swooping investment vultures are ready to purchase real estate that has been ransacked by storms while the most benevolent approach we see is that which says Tyler’s gang spends the internet profit from their merchandise on food giveaways, baby Mr. Beast style.
In an unusual turn, Twisters instructs its characters as a matter of moral duty to move towards the soon to be affected areas of tornadoes although it struggles to explain what’s the point of the rush. One of the sadder critiques of this age is that in the film, the climax shot is of the protagonist, who finds a solution to a storm surge, which is a small facet to the endeavor of creating a world of peace, while no attention is paid to the larger picture impacting the hero characters like winds lashing the sea.
For more movies Twisters visit 123Movies.