Throughout his career, Ron Howard has never shied away from casting a wide net as a filmmaker in the 40 years that he has been active he has made films around mermaids, cocoons, car factories, space travel, firehouses, journalists, geniuses, cave divers, the grinch, DaVinci code, the beatless, and Puccini. However, during the world premiere of his new movie ‘Eden’ at the Toronto film festival, he said that there is no other work which differs as much from his other works., this being his night to be right. He’s right, but not for the reasons which he, himself thinks.
Eden, which recounts episodes that occurred about a century ago in one the islands of the Galápagos, is nearly impossible to pinpoint a genre. It has been termed as having a ‘’thriller’’ component, but to me it can perhaps be best described as one Man Friday and a few anti-heroes scorned by the world attempting to survive on a deserted island, except there is a twist: the original ‘Virginia Wolfe’ concept. Appropriately enough in my opinion, for Howard Markiewicz the film is What Remains Calm and Composed (contains sex, violence, and animal abuse). But then again, there is one more definition of it awful. JET COURSE There is no question that Howard’s film, which is not the kind of film he is known for, is the most appealing one in the history of world cinema but these are just alternative strange themes that people began to discuss not even after but before the film was released. The reason behind his hesitation is, however, not that. This is because Howard was so taken away (or absorbed) by the issue, so immersed in it that he never did something that he can and does do successfully every time, and that is simple: narrative.
History repeats itself, saying no attempt is made at making an original character. Undoubtedly, we come to the screen hoping for originality and feeling inspired by the characters. In “The Order”, I just witnessed Jude Law deliver one of the most sincere and intensely crafted portrayals of an FBI agent in a film. Here is the only representative left chosen by the director for such roles. Lauer, a peace loving conservative who prefers barbarism to the polite society, portrays Friedrich Ritter, a German doctor who has left civilization to immigrate to the green island of Floriana in southern Ecuador’s Galapagos archipelago. Now it’s 1929, and as the Great War has ended ages ago, the economic prosperity which the world enjoyed after suppression is now concealed in the shadows due to the Great Depression. That is how Ritter envisions the future: chaos and collapse of the systems, but with potential for a new perfect society. And this perfect man must be the architect of this new, immaculate world.
He slogs for long periods of time and “clack clack clack”! I found myself imagining all the death and madness which fueled Nietzsche’s mind while composing self glorifying arguments. All this time Ritter feverishly and fervently marmorizes the world in typewriters. But somehow, it seems that which is understood so easily, has virtually no chance of ever coming to fruition.
How sad it is that he should feel that way. Such contempt for humanity makes it clear why he has left Germany to become a tropical recluse. It is not to confuse, but rather admire it is selfish and vain. Poor Dora Vanesa, she’s with Friedrich and how many others? Together, she and her husband behave as an oversexed, over the top, everything eating Adam and Eve. The idea itself is grand, and there is a good deal of sympathy in them, but in this case the sparring seems to predominate in the relationship as well, so we can only guess that the Ritters are united by some crusade that can hardly succeed because it is insane. Friedrich is not a Nietzschean figure. He rather resembles a shameless 1960s drug fueled overweight fanatic.
So what’s the big deal? It is that which Howard and his screenwriter, Noah Pink, never managed to explore. In the beginning, a different couple appears, and they are the exact opposite of the Ritters. They are Heinz Witmer (Daniel Bruhm) and his wife, Margaret (Sydney Sweeney), who have travelled to Floriana because they too have heard of the Ritters and want to be a part of what they are doing. They also took with them their son, Harry (Jonathan Titter) he is sick with tuberculosis and they were unable to afford a sanitarium perhaps the island will help him recover. You’d think a communal theorist such as Ritter would be glad to see such followers but on the contrary it’s quite the opposite. He sends them to the stone grotto close to the place explaining how Cubans struggle just to get fresh water to the island. He does not exactly provide an amiable welcome, nor is there a dramatic bond between the two couples. The exchanges are muted and sullen.
Howard has stated that ‘Eden’ was created based on two radically opposed views of what happened, and that is what it makes: a film that is never able to find a point of identification. We are distanced from them such that our interaction is as though we are viewing the characters from the perspective of a bug colony. A lot of animal activity is also witnessed: crabs, wild boar, full frontal Jude Law.
Then appears a hidden figure another guest on the island, but this time with ulterior motives. Eloise Bosquet de Wagner Whereon, also known as the dinner bell, is played by Ana de Amras, who has already garnered attention as a ‘fun woman’ that wanders with several men while professing grand dreams of erecting a five-star resort in the isle. Does she actually mean that? Is it true that she is a lady? De Aromas depicts the character as someone with a ‘cheesy grin’ and an accent straight out of young Frankenstein speaking to him in Madeline Khan’s voice. She seems to be acting in one of those 1930s drawing room comedies which is quite ridiculous, but for few moments one can actually sense the action coming back in the movie when she is on screen. Most of the time it is progressively getting back to its poorly decorated enduring bad feeling (and stink even de Armah’s pretend aristocratic wretchedness is tiring).
The film starts to drag. It drags without vigor without direction, but has quite a bit of incoherent exhibitionism. Margaret played by Sydney Sweeney is awarded the film’s center of logic, given to the cool, calm, and charismatic characters. Despite being almost forced to endure an extremely brutal childbirth sequence, which is calculative orchestrated to repulse the viewer, Margaret feels some sympathy towards the character.
As the ties begin to break down and the plot takes a twisted and off beat interpretation of Lord of the Flies, it is difficult to comprehend the footage. One had hoped that Howard would be more attentive to the emotional participation of the audience in these characters from the start. He appears to think that we will all participate in the journey. But I don’t think there are many who are going to enjoy “Eden,” a film which people would rather wish to escape the island and return to an environment that is not devoid of reason.
For more movies like Eden visit 123Movies.